Contact
How to shop
Delivery
Shopping guide
Efficient Designs for Judgment Analysis
Exploration of Alternative Designs for Judgment Analysis Application in Public Policy Formulation
English
193 b
30-day return policy
Customers also purchased
/
Paperback
77.37
€
/
Paperback
34.93
€
In formulating a public policy, judgment analysis enablespolicy makers to assess and accommodate the relative importance ofdiffering viewpoints and concerns of competing actors as ananalytic decision aid. Among the important constraints that preventjudgment analysis from being widely applied to the policyformulation process is a methodological limitation inherent injudgment analysis: It requires too many scenarios to be judged in asingle judgment task. Addressing this issue, this dissertationimplemented two efficient design concepts - efficient plausibledesign and augmented representative design - suggested byMcClelland (1999) as alternative design frameworks for judgmentanalysis that balance two conflicting principles: the principles ofrepresentative design and statistical efficiency. It also sought toderive a generalizable rule about the minimum number of casesneeded to arrive at reliable conclusions about a judgment policygiven the judgment task. Additionally, it tested the applicabilityof the bootstrap analysis as an alternative method to estimate thestability of the coefficients modeled for a judgment policy giventhe limited number of observations.
About the book
English
Give this book today
It's easy
1 Add to cart and choose Deliver as present at the checkout 2 We'll send you a voucher 3 The book will arrive at the recipient's addressYou might also be interested in
/
Paperback
30.48
€
/
Paperback
9.41
€
/
Paperback
11.23
€
/
Paperback
70.99
€
