Free delivery for orders over 69.99 euro.

Check order status

Become part of a community of book lovers from all over the world and get access to a whole bunch of benefits. Create an account for free

Free delivery for purchases over 69.99 €

DPD courier 5.99 € Bpost point 7.99 € Bpost 7.49 € DPD point 3.49 € GLS courier 4.49 €

Contact

How to shop

Help

My account

▸ Empty :-(

Free delivery for orders over 69.99 euro.

Loss Given Default Modeling: a Comparative Analysis

Name: Loss Given Default Modeling: a Comparative Analysis
Brand: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing
SKU: 18715689
Price: 25.89 EUR
Availability: InStock
Author: Olga Yashkir
ISBN: 9786202093750

Olga Yashkir

Yuri Yashkir

Language

English

Book Paperback

Libristo code: 18715689

Publishers LAP Lambert Academic Publishing, November 2016

Several most popular Loss Given Default (LGD) models were investigated (LSM, Tobit, Three-Tiered Tob... Full description

Libristo code: 18715689

63 b

25.89 €

In stock at our supplier Shipping in 5-8 days

30-day return policy

Customers also purchased

Charite sacerdotale, ou Lecons elementaires de theologie pastorale. Tome 2 DESURMONT-A

Paperback

35.20 €

Les droits sexuels ou la destruction programmée de l’enfance et de la famille Sigaut

Paperback

26.50 €

Die Sünde aber gebiert den Tod Andrea Schacht

Paperback

9.10 €

Carte des Vignobles et Vins de France - Affiche 50x70cm

binding.

30.95 €

leben // gestalten Ulf Kilian

Hardback

22.75 €

Several most popular Loss Given Default (LGD) models were investigated (LSM, Tobit, Three-Tiered Tobit, Beta Regression, Inflated Beta Regression, Censored Gamma Regression) in order to compare their performance. We show that for a given input data set, the quality of the model calibration depends mainly on the proper choice of explanatory variables, but not on the fitting model. Model factors were chosen based on their correlation with historical LGDs of the calibration data set. Numerical values of non-quantitative parameters (industry, ranking, type of collateral) were introduced as their LGD average. We show that different debt instruments depend on different sets of model factors (from three factors for Revolving Credit or for Subordinated Bonds to eight factors for Senior Secured Bonds). Calibration of LGD models using distressed business cycle periods provide better fit than data from total available time span. Calibration algorithms and details of their realization using the R statistical package are presented. We demonstrate how LGD models can be used for stress testing. The results of this study can be of use to risk managers concerned with the Basel accord compliance.